<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Phone review &#8211; Smartphone Round Robin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nokiaexperts.com/windows-phone-review-smartphone-robin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nokiaexperts.com/windows-phone-review-smartphone-robin/</link>
	<description>Everything Nokia, S60, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aamir</title>
		<link>http://nokiaexperts.com/windows-phone-review-smartphone-robin/comment-page-1/#comment-7312</link>
		<dc:creator>aamir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 01:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nokiaexperts.com/?p=2760#comment-7312</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;my previous comment regarding the ability to create wifi hotspot should be shown to palm ceo who says that pre plus would be the first phone to do so... bunch of lies... nokia was the first phone to do so...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my previous comment regarding the ability to create wifi hotspot should be shown to palm ceo who says that pre plus would be the first phone to do so&#8230; bunch of lies&#8230; nokia was the first phone to do so&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aamir</title>
		<link>http://nokiaexperts.com/windows-phone-review-smartphone-robin/comment-page-1/#comment-7161</link>
		<dc:creator>aamir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 06:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nokiaexperts.com/?p=2760#comment-7161</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i am disappointed to see that nokia is still using 400 to 600 mhz processors on its top end phones whereas htc has moved on to 1 ghz now... such a shame since Nokia was the hardware leader worldwide....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am disappointed to see that nokia is still using 400 to 600 mhz processors on its top end phones whereas htc has moved on to 1 ghz now&#8230; such a shame since Nokia was the hardware leader worldwide&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://nokiaexperts.com/windows-phone-review-smartphone-robin/comment-page-1/#comment-7158</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nokiaexperts.com/?p=2760#comment-7158</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have to agree with Tim, though not really for the lack of software on Maemo.  I just got a chance to play with my friend&#039;s N900 for three days and while I loved the power, I hated the interface.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At no point in the three days I had it did I ever feel like I was on a smartphone, it was more like an old linux computer....one that just happened to be able to fit in the palm of my hands.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I say old I don&#039;t mean slow, I mean when linux was 100% only for geeks, old.  No polish, nothing feels thought out for the end user.  All the features you&#039;d want in a high end smartphone are there, but man Nokia clearly never thought about employing a User Interface designer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was amazed that the mail client expected users to put in pop and smtp server addresses for popular email services like gmail....I was like, really?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The N900 just had a whole lot of little &quot;issues&quot; that left me cold.  I could look past the random restarting thing, but the UI felt so unpolished next to all the other smartphones out, that I could never recommend the N900.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Which is a shame because the N900 really does a lot of things really well.  The Video playback is smooth as butter.  The browser is top notch, even doing a good job at Flash.  Going by Bounce, the N900 graphics capabilities are also staggeringly awesome.  The keyboard is pretty good (not Touch Pro2 good, but still).  And overall build quality is very solid.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was left thinking Nokia rushed out the N900 and really it needed 5 or 6 more months of development.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;HTC on the other hand is generally a bit sloppy on the multimedia side of things, but they&#039;ve gotten the user experience down almost perfectly now and for me that&#039;s more important that video playback frame rates.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Tim, though not really for the lack of software on Maemo.  I just got a chance to play with my friend&#8217;s N900 for three days and while I loved the power, I hated the interface.</p>

<p>At no point in the three days I had it did I ever feel like I was on a smartphone, it was more like an old linux computer&#8230;.one that just happened to be able to fit in the palm of my hands.</p>

<p>When I say old I don&#8217;t mean slow, I mean when linux was 100% only for geeks, old.  No polish, nothing feels thought out for the end user.  All the features you&#8217;d want in a high end smartphone are there, but man Nokia clearly never thought about employing a User Interface designer.</p>

<p>I was amazed that the mail client expected users to put in pop and smtp server addresses for popular email services like gmail&#8230;.I was like, really?</p>

<p>The N900 just had a whole lot of little &#8220;issues&#8221; that left me cold.  I could look past the random restarting thing, but the UI felt so unpolished next to all the other smartphones out, that I could never recommend the N900.</p>

<p>Which is a shame because the N900 really does a lot of things really well.  The Video playback is smooth as butter.  The browser is top notch, even doing a good job at Flash.  Going by Bounce, the N900 graphics capabilities are also staggeringly awesome.  The keyboard is pretty good (not Touch Pro2 good, but still).  And overall build quality is very solid.</p>

<p>I was left thinking Nokia rushed out the N900 and really it needed 5 or 6 more months of development.</p>

<p>HTC on the other hand is generally a bit sloppy on the multimedia side of things, but they&#8217;ve gotten the user experience down almost perfectly now and for me that&#8217;s more important that video playback frame rates.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://nokiaexperts.com/windows-phone-review-smartphone-robin/comment-page-1/#comment-7157</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nokiaexperts.com/?p=2760#comment-7157</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll still take a TP2 over an N900, N97. Not because i prefer WinMo (i currently use an i8910), but because even though WinMo is kinda old and cranky it has an established, widespread developer following, something Maemo doesn&#039;t. And IMO, something it may never see. I&#039;ve had an N810, and although it was a neat concept, no-one (except the home brewers) ever got onboard with the OS. And unfortunately, as much as Nokia tries, the N900 is going to still be seen as a proof of concept. If the N800/N810 had come with a sim slot way back when, i think a lot more people would be currently sporting Maemo phones. But not now, not when there are so many more established OS&#039;es available.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Great hardware, niche OS. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So although the TP2, and HD2, still are running nothing more than a polished version of Winmo 5 (upgrade after upgrade does NOT make a &#039;new&#039; OS), if i only had the choice of the two, i&#039;d go with WinMo. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We (my employers) use TP2&#039;s as daily devices for our field (desktop support) engineers. I&#039;ve upgraded most of them to 6.5, and they work fine (except when the engineers beat the sh*t out of them!). We also use Nokia&#039;s (E71&#039;s), but there is no way i would recommend we switch the engineers to N97&#039;s, Mini&#039;s. I&#039;ve used them, and they just don&#039;t compare. Bear in mind, as i&#039;ve said elsewhere, that i come from being an N73 and E90 user over the last 3 years. But i just can&#039;t see where Nokia&#039;s going, and until they sort themselves out (S60, Maemo, Symbian 3/4/5), i can only, if asked which antiquated, business centric,  phone OS with loads of apps to go with, suggest WinMo.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll still take a TP2 over an N900, N97. Not because i prefer WinMo (i currently use an i8910), but because even though WinMo is kinda old and cranky it has an established, widespread developer following, something Maemo doesn&#8217;t. And IMO, something it may never see. I&#8217;ve had an N810, and although it was a neat concept, no-one (except the home brewers) ever got onboard with the OS. And unfortunately, as much as Nokia tries, the N900 is going to still be seen as a proof of concept. If the N800/N810 had come with a sim slot way back when, i think a lot more people would be currently sporting Maemo phones. But not now, not when there are so many more established OS&#8217;es available.</p>

<p>Great hardware, niche OS. </p>

<p>So although the TP2, and HD2, still are running nothing more than a polished version of Winmo 5 (upgrade after upgrade does NOT make a &#8216;new&#8217; OS), if i only had the choice of the two, i&#8217;d go with WinMo. </p>

<p>We (my employers) use TP2&#8242;s as daily devices for our field (desktop support) engineers. I&#8217;ve upgraded most of them to 6.5, and they work fine (except when the engineers beat the sh*t out of them!). We also use Nokia&#8217;s (E71&#8242;s), but there is no way i would recommend we switch the engineers to N97&#8242;s, Mini&#8217;s. I&#8217;ve used them, and they just don&#8217;t compare. Bear in mind, as i&#8217;ve said elsewhere, that i come from being an N73 and E90 user over the last 3 years. But i just can&#8217;t see where Nokia&#8217;s going, and until they sort themselves out (S60, Maemo, Symbian 3/4/5), i can only, if asked which antiquated, business centric,  phone OS with loads of apps to go with, suggest WinMo.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://nokiaexperts.com/windows-phone-review-smartphone-robin/comment-page-1/#comment-7156</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nokiaexperts.com/?p=2760#comment-7156</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Honestly the day HTC leaves Windows Mobile is the day Microsoft might as well call it quits in the mobile space.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly the day HTC leaves Windows Mobile is the day Microsoft might as well call it quits in the mobile space.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

