<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nokia now has four smartphone classes; Nseries, Eseries, Xseries, and Cseries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nokiaexperts.com/nokia-smartphone-classes-nseries-eseries-xseries-cseries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nokiaexperts.com/nokia-smartphone-classes-nseries-eseries-xseries-cseries/</link>
	<description>Everything Nokia, S60, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Look: The Nokia C7-00 and a review. &#124; &#124; Jane Talks Tech!Jane Talks Tech!</title>
		<link>http://nokiaexperts.com/nokia-smartphone-classes-nseries-eseries-xseries-cseries/comment-page-1/#comment-15955</link>
		<dc:creator>First Look: The Nokia C7-00 and a review. &#124; &#124; Jane Talks Tech!Jane Talks Tech!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 18:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nokiaexperts.com/?p=3310#comment-15955</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] class of devices (and by extension, a different type of user); The Nokia C7 belongs to the C-series line and the N8 belongs to the N-series. According to Wikipedia, here are the list of C-series devices, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] class of devices (and by extension, a different type of user); The Nokia C7 belongs to the C-series line and the N8 belongs to the N-series. According to Wikipedia, here are the list of C-series devices, [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First Look: The Nokia C7-00 and a review. - Jane Talks Tech!</title>
		<link>http://nokiaexperts.com/nokia-smartphone-classes-nseries-eseries-xseries-cseries/comment-page-1/#comment-15373</link>
		<dc:creator>First Look: The Nokia C7-00 and a review. - Jane Talks Tech!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nokiaexperts.com/?p=3310#comment-15373</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] class of devices (and by extension, a different type of user); The Nokia C7 belongs to the C-series line and the N8 belongs to the N-series. According to Wikipedia, here are the list of C-series devices, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] class of devices (and by extension, a different type of user); The Nokia C7 belongs to the C-series line and the N8 belongs to the N-series. According to Wikipedia, here are the list of C-series devices, [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ala'eddine</title>
		<link>http://nokiaexperts.com/nokia-smartphone-classes-nseries-eseries-xseries-cseries/comment-page-1/#comment-8740</link>
		<dc:creator>Ala'eddine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nokiaexperts.com/?p=3310#comment-8740</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i think it&#039;s a nice idea... However real names would be great... Once I was in saudi arabia, and there they actually name the nokia phones. For instance nokia 6600 was &quot;the panda&quot;, another was &quot;the bee&quot;, it made identifying phones that much easier especially for phones with four-digit names like nokia1234, nseries eseries names are easier to remember but still names are much better. I like tom&#039;s suggestion though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it&#8217;s a nice idea&#8230; However real names would be great&#8230; Once I was in saudi arabia, and there they actually name the nokia phones. For instance nokia 6600 was &#8220;the panda&#8221;, another was &#8220;the bee&#8221;, it made identifying phones that much easier especially for phones with four-digit names like nokia1234, nseries eseries names are easier to remember but still names are much better. I like tom&#8217;s suggestion though.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://nokiaexperts.com/nokia-smartphone-classes-nseries-eseries-xseries-cseries/comment-page-1/#comment-8542</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nokiaexperts.com/?p=3310#comment-8542</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a nice idea, but confusing over the long term. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just 1-9? What happens when they replace a phone in the lineup, call it the X6A? Or do they just re-use the number? I have a Nokia 1000 -- the analog one, not the digital Nokia 1000. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe they can tag the number after a descriptive name.. the &quot;Wombat E5&quot; would be this year&#039;s cool mid-level enterprise phone, while the &quot;Zebra E5&quot; is the 2015 version...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a nice idea, but confusing over the long term. </p>

<p>Just 1-9? What happens when they replace a phone in the lineup, call it the X6A? Or do they just re-use the number? I have a Nokia 1000 &#8212; the analog one, not the digital Nokia 1000. </p>

<p>Maybe they can tag the number after a descriptive name.. the &#8220;Wombat E5&#8243; would be this year&#8217;s cool mid-level enterprise phone, while the &#8220;Zebra E5&#8243; is the 2015 version&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal</title>
		<link>http://nokiaexperts.com/nokia-smartphone-classes-nseries-eseries-xseries-cseries/comment-page-1/#comment-8537</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nokiaexperts.com/?p=3310#comment-8537</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is a great move for Nokia as it was very difficult for end-users to correctly understand the differences between.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For independent software development companies, this will help for sure to easily target and support the right line of product to support.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The only issue remain is that Nokia has still a 2 OS development strategy and this is still a risk for them IMHO.  I guess that having the same dev. tool for both (QT) may help but I doubt.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Instead of putting effort in Symbian and making it &quot;touchable&quot;, I would instead keep MeeGo for X and N Series while using S60 3rd FP2 and beyond for keyboard centric type of devices...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a great move for Nokia as it was very difficult for end-users to correctly understand the differences between.</p>

<p>For independent software development companies, this will help for sure to easily target and support the right line of product to support.</p>

<p>The only issue remain is that Nokia has still a 2 OS development strategy and this is still a risk for them IMHO.  I guess that having the same dev. tool for both (QT) may help but I doubt.</p>

<p>Instead of putting effort in Symbian and making it &#8220;touchable&#8221;, I would instead keep MeeGo for X and N Series while using S60 3rd FP2 and beyond for keyboard centric type of devices&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

